Comparing location-specific and location-open social media data: methodological lessons from a study of blaming of minorities on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Zhang Shiyi,Tsatsou Panayiota,McLaren Lauren,Zhu YimeiORCID

Abstract

AbstractSocial media platforms such as Twitter (currently X) have become important sites of public discourse and participation. Researchers have attempted to identify and collect Twitter data within a certain country or region in order to answer research questions within a particular locale. However, location information of tweets is limited. Tackling the case of public blaming of minorities on Twitter in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, we present a method for identifying UK-based tweets and analyse two types of datasets that we collected and processed: (a) tweets with UK location-tags (labelled as location-specific data and referred to as UK datasets); and (b) tweets with UK location-tags and / or user profiles containing potential UK location information (labelled as location-open data and referred to as ALL datasets). The empirical results reveal that the overall sentiments in the two dataset types align in the same direction, but the location-specific datasets contain more extreme discourses (i.e., more positive and more negative sentiments and fewer neutral sentiments). Furthermore, in the location-specific datasets, the range of theme areas is narrower, although the themes still grasp the essence of the discussion about blaming minorities found in the larger dataset. The findings demonstrate strengths and limitations of the two dataset types and that the location-specific data can be suitable especially when the available research resources are insufficient for collecting or processing larger datasets. Nevertheless, we propose that future research may consider comparing smaller and bigger datasets to test differences between these for other topics for which specific locations may be of particular interest.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3