Abstract
AbstractForest Owners Organizations can help small- and medium-scale private landowners stay competitive by conducting and sharing research and development (R&D) activities. This study evaluated R&D needs for silvicultural operations to inform an R&D strategy for the cooperative. Individual and group priorities were collected using the Analytical Hierarchy Process via a web survey and web meeting. Consensus in priorities was followed by an assessment of the cooperative's capacity to carry out in-house research. Two regional managers, eight plantation managers and one R&D/Technology manager participated in one or more stages of the process. Participants ranked most silvicultural operations similarly. However, the variation was largest for harvest residue, seedling, and stump management. Minor regional differences were found but both regions (south and north) had “very high” group consensus indicators (86.2% and 89%, respectively). The group decision ranked R&D in harvest residue management as the highest priority, followed by soil preparation and planting methods. The cooperative's strongest capacity for in-house research was in the execution of the experimental design to address the research questions (implementation). The weakest research capacity was found in terms of harvest residue, seedling, and stump management. Hence, the cooperative is dependent on research institutions. These findings can be used to inform and align the cooperative's R&D strategy, investments, and their research collaborations.
Funder
NCT Forestry Agricultural Cooperative Limited
Stellenbosch University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Andersson E, Keskitalo ECH (2019) Service logics and strategies of Swedish forestry in the structural shifts of forest ownership: challenging the “old” and shaping the “new.” Scand J for Res 34(6):508–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1604990
2. Blagojevic B, Athanassiadis D, Spinelli R, Raitila J, Vos J (2020) Determining the relative importance of factors affecting the success of innovations in forest technology using AHP. J Multi-Criteria Dec Anal 27(1–2):129–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1670
3. Blagojević B, Jonsson R, Björheden R, Nordström E-M, Lindroos O (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in forest operations—an introductional review. Croat J for Eng 40(1):191–205
4. Brenner MS (1994) Practical R&D project prioritization. Res Technol Manag 37(5):38–42
5. Brown M, Ghaffariyan MR, Berry M, Acuna M, Strandgard M, Mitchell R (2020) The progression of forest operations technology and innovation. Aust for 83(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1723044