Mysticism without concepts

Author:

Gäb SebastianORCID

Abstract

AbstractIt has often been claimed, e.g. by William James or Aldous Huxley, that mystical experiences across times and cultures exhibit a striking similarity. Even though the words and images we use to describe them are different, underneath the surface we find a common experiential core. Others have rejected this claim and argued that all experiences are intrinsically shaped by the mystics’ pre-existing religious concepts. Against these constructivist objections, I defend the idea of a common core by arguing that even if all experience is interpreted through concepts, there could still be a common core. Those who reject the common core thesis usually argue that no distinction between experience and interpretation can be made since all experience is per se already interpreted. The notion of an uninterpreted experience is self-defeating. Drawing on current research on nonconceptual mental content, I argue (a) that experiences can have nonconceptual content; (b) that interpretation must be understood as conceptualization and (c) that conceptualization presupposes a raw mental content that is not conceptualized. This raw content is not experienced as nonconceptual. Rather, the nonconceptual, uninterpreted common core is an abstraction which shows itself only through reflection. Thus, the existence of a common core is compatible with the fact that all experiences are interpreted.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Reference24 articles.

1. Agam-Segal, Reshef. (2014). When language gives out. Conceptualization, and aspect-seeing as a form of judgement. Metaphilosophy, 45, 41–68

2. Alston, W. (1991). Perceiving God. Cornell University Press.

3. Crane, Tim: The nonconceptual content of experience. In: Crane, Tim (ed.): The Contents of Experience. Essays in Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 136–157.

4. Davies, Brian: An Introduction to the philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32004.

5. Davis, F. (1989). Caroline: The evidential force of religious experience. Clarendon.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mystical ineffability: a nonconceptual theory;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2024-02-21

2. Metaphors as Knowledge in Mystical Writings;Religions;2023-08-14

3. La validité du contenu expérientiel et épistémique de l’expérience spirituelle à travers la pensée transpersonnelle;La Pensée écologique;2022-07-18

4. Stairway to Heaven;Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease;2022-06-24

5. Mystical Experience;Religions;2022-06-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3