Abstract
AbstractAgainst claims that cognitive science of religion undercuts belief in God, many defenders of theistic belief have invoked the Religious Reasons Reply: science cannot undercut belief in God if one has good independent reasons to believe. However, it is unclear whether this response helps salvage the god beliefs of most people. This paper considers four questions: (1) What reasons do Christians have for believing in God? (2) What kinds of beliefs about God can the reasons support? (3) Are the reasons rationalizations? (4) Can cognitive science undercut the reasons? Many Christians invoke everyday religious experiences (EREs)—such as experiences of divine presence, guidance, and communication—as reasons to believe. Unlike another popular reason to believe in God (the appearance of design and beauty in nature), EREs can support beliefs about a relational God who is present to me, who guides my life, and who speaks to me. EREs are not rationalizations since they seem to cause and sustain such beliefs. Nonetheless, EREs like experiences of hearing God speak are problematic reasons to believe. ‘Soft’ voice-hearing experiences are easily undercut. ‘Hard’ experiences of an external, audible voice are probably underpinned by similar cognitive processes as audio-verbal hallucinations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Allen, C. (2020). Teleological Notions in Biology. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleology-biology/
2. Atkinson, A. R. (2023). The places of agency detection and predictive processing in the ontogenesis of religious belief; and “Who put the ‘H’ in the HADD?” Religion, Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2023.2168731
3. Barrett, J. L., & Lanman, J. A. (2008). The science of religious beliefs. Religion, 38(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007
4. Bliksted, V., Frith, C., Videbech, P., Fagerlund, B., Emborg, C., Simonsen, A., Roepstorff, A., & Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. (2019). Hyper- and hypomentalizing in patients with first-episode schizophrenia: FMRI and behavioral studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(2), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby027
5. Braddock, M. (2016). Debunking arguments and the cognitive science of religion. Theology and Science, 14(3), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2016.1191878
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献