1. Arcavi, A., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2008). Using the unfamiliar to problematize the familiar. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,
8(3), 280–295.
2. Baldinger, E., & Louie, N. TRU Math conversation guide: A tool for teacher learning and growth. Berkeley, CA and E. Lansing, MI: Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley and College of Education, Michigan State University. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from
http://ats.berkeley.edu/tools.html
and
http://map.mathshell.org/materials/pd.php
.
3. Beeby, T., Burkhardt, H., & Caddy, R. (1980). SCAN: Systematic classroom analysis notation for mathematics lessons. England Shell Centre for Mathematics Education: Nottingham.
4. Brownell, J., Mahon, J., & Seward, R. (2016). TRU and the CPS plan for mathematics: Building mathematically powerful classrooms. In Presentation at the 15th annual Chicago lesson study conference, Chicago, IL, May 6, 2016.
5. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Downloaded June 4, 2010 from
http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
.