Author:
Bradley Steve,Crouchley Rob
Abstract
Abstract
We analyse the relationships between test scores, truancy and labour market outcomes for youths. Our econometric approach enables us to disentangle the observable direct and indirect effects of truancy and test scores on the risk of unemployment or ‘Not in Education, Employment or Training’ (NEET) from their unobserved effects. Using data for England and Wales, we show that models of youth unemployment and NEET that ignore the correlation between the unobservable determinants of test scores and truancy will lead to misleading inference about the strength of their effects. Truancy has an indirect observed effect on labour market outcomes via its effect on test scores, and a weak direct effect. The unobserved component of truancy has a direct effect on labour market outcomes. Test scores have a direct effect on those outcomes, but also mitigate the detrimental effects of truancy. Our analysis raises important implications for education policy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Mathematics (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability
Reference57 articles.
1. Andrews MJ, Bradley S (1997) Modelling the school-to-work transition and the demand for training in the United Kingdom. Economica 64:387–413
2. Andrews MJ, Bradley S, Stott D, Taylor J (2004) The evolution and determinants of the educational gender gap, mimeo. Department of Economics, Lancaster University, Lancaster
3. Arulampalam W, Gregg P, Gregory M (2001) Unemployment scarring. Econ J 111:F577–F584
4. Bell DNF, Blanchflower DG (2011) Youth unemployment and the great recession. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 27:243–264
5. Bell R, Jones G (2002) Youth policies in the UK: a chronological map, 2nd edn. Mimeo, New York
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献