Abstract
AbstractThis paper sheds light on an important causality which is of primary interest for policy makers, at both country level and broad institutional level, though it is largely ignored in the literature. Using panel data from a diversified group of countries and after controlling for various factors and endogeneities within the context of multivariate models, we present evidence that an increase in the intensity of government spending on education leads to an overall increase in the intensity of household spending on education of a roughly equal magnitude, within a span of two years. Specifically, a 1% increase in the intensity of government spending on education induces a contemporaneous increase in the intensity of household spending on education of 3%, followed by a correction of 2% the subsequent year. We further find that the reverse causality does not hold. Our mediation analysis within our set of variables suggests that the causality is only direct, and that there is no statistically significant distinction between low- and high-income countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Mathematics (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability
Reference60 articles.
1. Aghion P, Boustan PL, Caroline M, Hoxby MC, Vandenbussche J (2006) Exploiting states' mistakes to identify the causal impact of education on growth. In: NBER conference paper
2. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297
3. Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68:29–51
4. Bailey MJ, Dynarski SM (2011) Inequality in postsecondary education. In: Duncan GJ, Murnane RJ (eds) Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, Ch 6. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 117–132
5. Bandiera O, Caprio G, Honohan P, Schiantarelli F (2000) Does financial reform raise or reduce saving? Rev Econ Stat 82(2):239–263
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献