Accuracy of Quick-DASH tool versus CTS-6 tool in evaluating the outcome of carpal tunnel release-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Accuracy of Quick-DASH tool versus CTS-6 tool in evaluating the outcome of carpal tunnel release

Published:2021-09-16 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0930-343X
Container-title:European Journal of Plastic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Plast Surg

Author:

Powar Rajesh S.,Mahapure Kiran S.^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00238-021-01880-8.pdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard N, Smitham P (2012) Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J 6:69–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010069

2. İlhan D, Toker S, Kilincioğlu V, Gülcan E (2008) Assessment of the Boston Questionnaire in diagnosis of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: comparing scores with clinical and neurophysiological findings. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Derg 10(3):4–9

3. Lyrén P-E, Atroshi I (2012) Using item response theory improved responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Epidemiol 65(3):325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.009

4. Rosales RS, Delgado EB, Díez de la Lastra-Bosch I (2002) Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am 27(2):334–343. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059

5. Tunnel C (2006) Evaluation of boston questionnaire applied at late post-operative period of carpal tunnel syndrome operated with the paine retinaculatome through palmar port. Acta Ortop Bras 14(3):126

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Subjective and Objective Differences in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and the Role of Obesity in Syndrome Severity;Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery;2023-05-31