A novel three-in-one silicone model for basic microsurgery training

Author:

Alser Osaid,Youssef Gehad,Myers Simon,Ghanem Ali M.

Abstract

Abstract Background Microsurgery simulation is an important aspect of surgical training. Animal models have been widely used in simulation training, but they have some limitations including ethical restrictions, cost and availability. This has led to the use of synthetic models that can reduce reliance on animals in line with the 3R (refinement, reduction and replacement) principles. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the face validity of Surgitate™ three-in-one (artery, vein and nerve) silicone model. Methods Fourteen candidates performed one end-to-end anastomosis on artery, vein and nerve. The face validity of the vessel was assessed via questionnaires detailing their previous microsurgical experience and their feedback of using this model using the Likert scale. Data management and analysis were performed using IBM SPSS software (25.0). Results Participants tended to value this model in the earlier stages of microsurgical training particularly in the acquisition of basic microsurgical skills. It could be particularly useful in enhancing suturing skills as a replacement or reduction in the use of chicken models. The model has some drawbacks preluding its utilization into more advanced stages of surgical training. Further studies are needed to validate the model using more objective measures. Conclusion We present a novel synthetic model that can be potentially introduced to early stages of microsurgery training. The model would be ideal to meet the 3R principles of the use of animal models and as an alternative to the commonly used synthetic models. Level of evidence: Not ratable.

Funder

Queen Mary University of London

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Reference19 articles.

1. Nimmons GL, Chang KE, Funk GF, Shonka DC, Pagedar NA (2012) Validation of a task-specific scoring system for a microvascular surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope. 122(10):2164–2168

2. Rodriguez JR, Yanez R, Cifuentes I, Varas J, Dagnino B (2016) Microsurgery Workout: A Novel Simulation Training Curriculum Based on Nonliving Models. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(4):739e–747e

3. Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, Kim E, Myers S (2016) Anastomosis lapse index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 32(3):233–241

4. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The sources, incidence, and removal of inhumanity. In: The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen. https://caat.jhsph.edu/principles/chap4d (Accessed 15 March 2020)

5. Fanua SP, Kim J, Shaw Wilgis EF (2001) Alternative model for teaching microsurgery. Microsurgery. 21(8):379–382

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3