Virtual Service Delivery in Mental Health and Substance Use Care: A Systematic Review of Preference Elicitation Studies
-
Published:2024-09-13
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0010-3853
-
Container-title:Community Mental Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Community Ment Health J
Author:
Mallise CarlyORCID, Wall Laura, Paolucci Francesco, Davies Kate, La Hera Fuentes Gina, Wilson Jessica, Tickner Campbell, Kay-Lambkin Frances, Heinsch Milena
Abstract
AbstractMental health and substance use disorders affect the lives of many people worldwide. Prevention and treatment of these conditions is important for optimal health and wellbeing, yet service access barriers are common. Virtual models of care may help to reduce barriers to receiving care. However, to facilitate uptake and use of virtual services, they need to appeal to patients and clinicians. This systematic review aimed to synthesise preference elicitation studies to determine what features of virtual mental health and substance use care are preferred by service users and service providers. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EconLit, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Ultimate, and ProQuest Central for all available studies from database inception until May 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Nineteen studies met the eligibility criteria. However, none examined preferences for elements of different models of virtual care. Across the included studies, we identified 41 unique features that mapped to four themes of mental health and substance use care (‘service’, ‘treatment’, ‘clinician’ and ‘additional supports’). Participant preferences were for individual, in-person, effective, flexible, and low-cost treatment. These preferences varied based on demographic factors, such as culture, gender, and participant type (e.g., patients, clinicians, general population). A user-centred approach should be adopted when designing and implementing mental health and substance use services. While preferences for features of mental health and substance use services more broadly are known, preferences for different models of virtual care remain unexplored. Future research should examine what features of virtual services would lead to optimal uptake and use across different users and stakeholders.
Funder
The University of Newcastle
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018). Mental health. Australian Bureau of Statistics. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/mental-health/2017-18 2. Baker, C. (2020). Mental health statistics for England: prevalence, services and funding. The house of commons library. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/34934/1/SN06988%20(redacted).pdf 3. Bastien, G., Del Grande, C., Dyachenko, A., Kaczorowski, J., Page, M. G., Brissette, S., Lesperance, F., Dubreucq, S., Hooley, P., & Jutras-Aswad, D. (2021). Preferences for research design and treatment of comorbid depression among patients with an opioid use disorder: A cross-sectional discrete choice experiment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108857 4. Batterham, P. J., & Calear, A. L. (2017). Preferences for internet-based Mental Health interventions in an adult online sample: Findings from an Online Community Survey. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7722 5. Becker, M. P., Christensen, B. K., Cunningham, C. E., Furimsky, I., Rimas, H., Wilson, F., Jeffs, L., Bieling, P. J., Madsen, V., Chen, Y. Y., Mielko, S., & Zipursky, R. B. (2016). Preferences for Early Intervention Mental Health Services: A discrete-choice conjoint experiment. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D. C.), 67(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400306
|
|