The Impact of Structural Integration on Clinical Outcomes among Individuals with Serious Mental Illness and Chronic Illness

Author:

Matthews Elizabeth B.ORCID,Lushin Viktor,Macneal Eliza,Marcus Steve C.

Abstract

AbstractThough considered a best practice, there is substantial variation in how integrated behavioral health (IBH) services are structured. This study examined the impact of IBH structure on health outcomes among individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) and chronic disease receiving care in community health centers (CHCs). Data from the ADVANCE network identified 8,548 individuals with co-occurring SMI diabetes and 16,600 with an SMI and hypertension. Logistic regression tested whether IBH type impacted disease specific health outcomes among these populations. Among those with diabetes or hypertension, colocated care was associated with better health outcomes related to HbA1c, blood pressure control, and BMI compared to less coordinated and unintegrated care, though there was significant variation in this relationship across SMI diagnoses. Results reflect that colocation of primary care and behavioral health may improve outcomes for individuals with bipolar disorder or major depression and chronic disease, but that CHC-based integrated care may not be optimized for individuals with schizophrenia.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Leonard David Institute for Health Economics

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. Bartels, S. J., DiMilia, P. R., Fortuna, K. L., & Naslund, J. A. (2018). Integrated care for older adults with serious mental illness and medical comorbidity: Evidence-based models and future research directions. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2017.10.012.

2. Blackmore, M. A., Carleton, K. E., Ricketts, S. M., Patel, U. B., Stein, D., Mallow, A., Deluca, J. P., & Chung, H. (2018). Comparison of collaborative care and colocation treatment for patients with clinically significant depression symptoms in primary care. Psychiatric Services, 69(11), 1184–1187. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700569.

3. Bradford, D. W., Cunningham, N. T., Slubicki, M. N., McDuffie, J. R., Kilbourne, A. M., Nagi, A., & Williams, J. W. Jr. (2013). An evidence synthesis of care models to improve general medical outcomes for individuals with serious mental illness: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74(8), e754–764. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.12r07666.

4. Chang, E. T., Vinzon, M., Cohen, A. N., & Young, A. S. (2019). Effective models urgently needed to improve physical care for people with serious mental illnesses. Health Service Insights, 12, 1178632919837628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919837628.

5. Colton, C. W., & Manderscheid, R. W. (2006). Congruencies in increased mortality rates, years of potential life lost, and causes of death among public mental health clients in eight states. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3(2), A42.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3