Allocation of Users of Mental Health Services to Needs-Based Care Clusters: An Italian Pilot Study
-
Published:2023-10-26
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0010-3853
-
Container-title:Community Mental Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Community Ment Health J
Author:
Barbato Angelo, D’Avanzo Barbara, Corrao GiovanniORCID, Di Fiandra Teresa, Ferrara Lucia, Gaddini Andrea, Jarach Carlotta Micaela, Monzio Compagnoni MatteoORCID, Saponaro Alessio, Scondotto Salvatore, Tozzi Valeria D, Lora AntonioORCID
Abstract
AbstractIn Italy, despite strong community-based mental health services, needs assessment is unsatisfactory. Using the Mental Health Clustering Tool (MHCT) we adopted a multidimensional and non-diagnosis dependent approach to assign mental health services users with similar needs to groups corresponding to resources required for effective care. We tested the MHCT in nine Departments of Mental Health in four Italian regions. After a brief training, 318 professionals assessed 12,938 cases with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder and personality disorder through the MHCT. 53% of cases were 40–59 years, half were females, 51% had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, 48% of cases were clinically severe. Clusters included different levels of clinical severity and diagnostic groups. The largest cluster was 11 (ongoing recurrent psychosis), with 18.9% of the sample, followed by cluster 3 (non-psychotic disorders of moderate severity). The MHCT could capture a variety of problems of people with mental disorders beyond the traditional psychiatric assessment, therefore depicting service population from a different standpoint. Following a brief training, MHCT assessment proved to be feasible. The automatic allocation of cases made the attribution to clusters easy and acceptable by professionals. To what extent clustering provide a sound base for care planning will be the matter of further research.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference24 articles.
1. Allsopp, K., Read, J., Corcoran, R., & Kinderman, P. (2019). Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification. Psychiatry Research, 279, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.005. 2. Barbui, C., Papola, D., & Saraceno, B. (2018). Forty years without mental hospitals in Italy. Int J Mental Health Systems, 12(1), https://doi.org/1-9. 3. Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.817696. 4. Carvalho, A. F., Solmi, M., Sanches, M., Machado, M. O., Stubbs, B., Ajnakina, O., et al. (2020). Evidence-based umbrella review of 162 peripheral biomarkers for major mental disorders. Transl Psychiatry, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0835-5. 5. Cots, F., Chiarello, P., Salvador, X., Castells, X., & Quentin, W. (2011). DRG-based hospital payment: Intended and unintended consequences. In R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, & M. Wiley (Eds.), Diagnosis-related groups in Europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Open University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Data-Driven Analytics for Sustainable Mental Healthcare;Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice;2024-06-30
|
|