Abstract
AbstractNew driver assistance systems play an important role to rise safety and comfort in todays´ traffic. Those systems should be developed with the needs of the user in mind and tested for the users´ requirements. In this, user acceptance is a central variable of interest – both in scientific and in practical applications of user-centered research on driver assistance systems. In some cases, applied research settings need simplified measurements in order to be efficiently applicable in the driving situations. In the present paper, we explored the applicability and validity of a single-item acceptance measurement (SIAM) for practical study settings covering the attitude towards using new driver assistance systems. To provide a theoretical framing, we tested the one-item measure against the widely used Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the van der Laan acceptance scale (VDL) in a driving simulator study. Participants experienced four different complex driving scenarios using a driver assistance system. Acceptance was measured repeatedly throughout the drive. The results supported construct validity for the SIAM, correlating with the VDL. The SIAM further predicted the intention to use the system. Being carefully aware of the psychometric drawbacks of short scales and acknowledging the importance of multi-item scales, the SIAM is promising for efficiently approaching the acceptance of driver assistance systems in applied settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. SAE On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) committee (2021) Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendael, PA, United States
2. Kraus J, Scholz D, Stiegemeier D et al (2020) The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Hum Factors 62(5):718–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819853686
3. Rahman MM, Lesch MF, Horrey WJ et al (2017) Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accid Anal Prev 108:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011
4. Stiegemeier D, Bringeland S, Kraus J et al (2022) “Do I really need it?”: An explorative study of acceptance and usage of in-vehicle technology. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav 84:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.011
5. Beggiato M, Pereira M, Petzoldt T et al (2015) Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav 35:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Exploring Urban Challenges: Understanding Advanced Driver Assistance Systems in Different Situational Contexts;Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications;2024-09-11