1. Bach, K. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.
2. Battersby, M., and S. Bailin. 2011. Guidelines for reaching a reasoned judgment. In Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning, ed. J.A. Blair, and R.H. Johnson, 145–157. London: College.
3. Blair, J.A. 2011. Conductive reasoning/arguments: A map of the issues. In Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning, ed. J.A. Blair, and R.H. Johnson, 1–9. London: College.
4. Blair, J.A., and R.H. Johnson (eds.). 2011. Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning, studies in logic and argumentation, vol. 33. London: College.
5. Davidson, D. 1982. How is weakness of will possible? In Essays on actions and events, ed. D. Davidson, 21–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.