Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory

Published:2020-01-31 Issue:4 Volume:34 Page:449-465
ISSN:0920-427X
Container-title:Argumentation
language:en
Short-container-title:Argumentation

Author:

Olmos Paula^ORCID

Funder

Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-020-09511-5.pdf

Reference39 articles.

1. Achinstein, P. 1970. Inference to Scientific laws. In Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. V, ed. R.H. Stuewer, 87–111. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

2. Álvarez, M. 2010. Kinds of Reason An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Arabatzis, T. 2008. Experiment̕. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, ed. S. Psillos and M. Curd, 159–170. London: Routledge.

4. Barahona, A., and S. Martínez (eds.). 1998. Historia y Explicación en Biología. UNAM-FCE: México.

5. Beatty, J. 2016. ̒What are Narratives Good For?̕. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58: 33–40.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?;Argumentation;2023-01-27

2. Grappling with the Unnarratable: Introduction to Special Issue on Narratologies of Science;Journal of Narrative Theory;2023-01

3. Correction to: Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory;Argumentation;2020-03-09