Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future of Argument-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future of Argument

Published:2019-09-03 Issue:1 Volume:34 Page:25-37
ISSN:0920-427X
Container-title:Argumentation
language:en
Short-container-title:Argumentation

Author:

Scott Blake D.^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-019-09493-z.pdf

Reference22 articles.

1. Aakhus, Mark. 2017. The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities. Philosophy & Technology 30: 191–208.

2. Aberdein, Andrew. 2010. Virtue in Argument. Argumentation 24: 165–179.

3. Augustine. 1991. Confessions, trans. Henry Chadwick. New York: Oxford University Press.

4. Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, 2nd ed., trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Bolduc, Michelle K., and David A. Frank. 2012. Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation”. Philosophy & Rhetoric 43(4): 308–336.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Rhetorical Methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Theory of Argumentation;Philosophy & Rhetoric;2024-06

2. The rhetoric of urgency;Against Critical Thinking in Health, Social Care and Social Work;2023-07-10

3. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation;Argumentation;2023-03-22

4. Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion;Argumentation;2021-01-13