1. Alexy, R. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation. The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification (Translation of Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1978.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Atiyah, P.S., and R.S. Summers. 1991. Form and substance in Anglo-American law: A comparative study of legal reasoning, legal theory and legal institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Bertea, S. 2005. Does arguing from coherence make sense? Argumentation 19(4): 433–446.
4. Bustamante, T. 2013. On the argumentum ad absurdum in statutory interpretation: Its uses and normative significance. In Legal argumentation theory: Cross-disciplinary perspectives, ed. E.T. Feteris, and C. Dahlman, 21–44. Dordrecht: Springer.
5. Canale, D., and G. Tuzet. 2009. Inferring the ratio: Commitments and constraints. In Argumentation and the application of legal rules, ed. E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, and H.J. Plug, 15–34. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.