Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature

Published:2019-09-10 Issue:4 Volume:33 Page:541-578
ISSN:0920-427X
Container-title:Argumentation
language:en
Short-container-title:Argumentation

Author:

Yan Lin-qiong^ORCID,Ming‑hui Xiong

Funder

National Sun Yat-sen University

Jiangsu Province Projects for Philosophy and Social Sciences in Higher Educational Institutions

Guizhou Provincial Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Sciences

Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-019-09495-x.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Barnes, J. 1984. The complete works of Aristotle. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

2. Chan, A.K.L. 2002. Mencius: Contexts and interpretations. Hawaii: University of Hawaii’s Press.

3. Chen, H (陈洪杏). 2013. Rethinking about “Argumentation between Mencius and Gaozi”: Arguments on Mencius’s logic from the linguistic perspective (“孟告之辩”再读解——辅以语言学角度论证孟子逻辑的一以贯之). Philosophical Trends (《哲学动态》) 8: 59–65.

4. Chen, L (陈来). 2018. Interpretation of Book King Hui of Liang (《梁惠王篇》). In Chen Lai & Wang Zhimin eds. (陈来、王志民主编) Interpretations of the Seven Books of Mencius (《孟子》七篇解读). Shandong: Qilu Publishing House (山东:齐鲁书社).

5. Cherry, K. 2018. The age-old debate of nature vs. nurture. Reviewed by Steven Gans, MD. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-nature-versus-nurture-2795392 . Updated November 21, 2018.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pragma-dialectical perspective to intercultural discussion as communicative activity;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2023-11-30

2. Chinese Studies on Informal Logic and Critical Thinking;Asian Studies;2022-05-09