Author:
de Donato Rodríguez Xavier,Zamora Bonilla Jesús
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy
Reference71 articles.
1. Alston, W. 1988. The deontological conception of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 257–299.
2. Andersen, H., P. Barker, and X. Chen. 2006. The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baltas, A. 2000. Classifying scientific controversies. In Scientific controversies, ed. Machamer, Pera, and Baltas, 40–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Barker, P. 2011. The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Erkenntnis 75(3): 445–465.
5. Barrotta, P., and M. Dascal (eds.). 2005. Controversies and subjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Epidemiology of Fallacies;Argumentation;2024-06-03
2. Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity in Science;Social Epistemology;2023-09-25
3. Learning from scientific disagreement;THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science;2021-04-26
4. There’s No Such Thing as a Scientific Controversy;Technical Communication Quarterly;2019-02-26