Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry

Published:2015-09-22 Issue:1 Volume:30 Page:45-60
ISSN:0920-427X
Container-title:Argumentation
language:en
Short-container-title:Argumentation

Author:

Andone Corina

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-015-9372-4.pdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Anderson, Ch. 1979. The place of principles in policy analysis. The American Political Science Review 73(3): 711–723.

2. Andone, C. 2015a. Pragmatic argumentation in European practices of political accountability. Argumentation 29: 1–18.

3. Andone, C. 2015b, in press. Engagement et non-engagement dans les appels à la majorité par des hommes politiques. Argumentation et analyse du discours 16.

4. Ball, W.J. 1995. A pragmatic framework for the evaluation of policy arguments. Policy Studies Review 14(1/2): 3–24.

5. Black, J., M. Hopper, and C. Band. 2007. Making a success of principles-based regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review 5: 191–206.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Argumentative patterns based on pragmatic argumentation at China’s diplomatic press conferences;Discourse Studies;2023-04-05

2. The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style;Journal of Argumentation in Context;2021-02-04

3. “The people want it”;Journal of Argumentation in Context;2020-12-17

4. Transformative Learning;Global Jihad in Muslim and non-Muslim Contexts;2020

5. Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining;Argumentation;2018-01-03