Abstract
AbstractIn response to an accusation of having said something inappropriate, the accused may exploit the difference between the explicit contents of their utterance and its implicatures. Widely discussed in the pragmatics literature are those cases in which arguers accept accountability only for the explicit contents of what they said while denying commitment to the (alleged) implicature (“Those are your words, not mine!”). In this paper, we sketch a fuller picture of commitment denial. We do so, first, by including in our discussion not just denial of implicatures, but also the mirror strategy of denying commitment to literal meaning (e.g. “I was being ironic!”) and, second, by classifying strategies for commitment denial in terms of classical rhetorical status theory (distinguishing between denial, redefinition, an appeal to ‘external circumstances’ or to a ‘wrong judge’). In addition to providing a systematic categorization of our data, this approach offers some clues to determine when such a defence strategy is a reasonable one and when it is not.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy
Reference37 articles.
1. Bakema, P., P. Defour, and D. Geeraerts. 1993. The semantic structure of the diminutive. Forum der Letteren 34(2): 121–137.
2. Birner, B.J. 2013. Introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Boogaart, R. 2020. Expressives in argumentation. The case of apprehensive straks (‘shortly’) in Dutch. In From argument schemes to argumentative relations in the wild: A variety of contributions to argumentation theory, ed. F. van Eemeren and B.G. Garssen, 185–204. Cham: Springer.
4. Braet, A. 2007. Reasonableness in classical rhetoric. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
5. Branum, J. K. 2018. “We spoke with a certain amount of hyperbole”: Strategic manoeuvring, deception and derailment in the discourse of Cambridge Analytica. Student paper, MA-course, Leiden University.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献