The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion

Author:

Pruś JakubORCID,Sikora PiotrORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to discuss a well-known concept from argumentation theory, namely the principle of charity. It will show that this principle, especially in its contemporary version as formulated by Donald Davidson, meets with some serious problems. Since we need the principle of charity in any kind of critical discussion, we propose the way of modifying it according to the presupponendum—the rule written in the sixteenth century by Ignatius Loyola. While also corresponding with pragma-dialectical rules, it also provides additional content. This will be termed the dialectical principle of charity, and it offers a few steps to be performed during an argument in order to make sure that the participants understand each other well and are not deceived by any cognitive bias. The meaning of these results could be of great significance for argumentation theory, pragma-dialectics and the practice of public discourse as it enhances the principle of charity and makes it easier to apply in argumentation.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Reference31 articles.

1. Adler, Jonathan E. 1996. Charity, Interpretation, Fallacy. Philosophy & Rhetoric 29 (4): 329–343.

2. Baillargeon, Normand. 2007. Intellectual Self-Defense. New York: Seven Stories Press.

3. Bloch, Artur. 1980. Murphy's law, book two : more reasons why things go wrong. Los Angeles: Price Stern Sloan.

4. Chandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad, Siu Kit Yeung, Ka Chai Yau, Chung Yee Cheung, Tanay Kulbhushan Agarwal, Cho Yan Joan. Wong, Tanishka Pillai, Thea Natasha Thirlwell, Wing Nam Leung, Colman Tse, Yan Tung Li, Bo Ley Cheng, Hill Yan Cedar. Chan, and Gilad Feldman. 2021. Agency and Self-other Asymmetries in Perceived Bias and Shortcomings: Replications of the Bias Blind Spot and Link to Free Will Beliefs. Judgment and Decision Making 16 (6): 1392–1412.

5. Channel 4 News. 2013. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3