Abstract
AbstractDespite significant progress in the development of advanced technologies for detecting and monitoring unstable slopes, accurately predicting catastrophic landslides remains a challenge. To tackle this challenge, our research integrates advanced prediction models and granular systems theory to provide insights into regime shifts within slow-moving deep-seated landslide dynamics. Our approach is designed to discern exceptional departures from historical landslide dynamics. The approach leverages the “group dynamics,” crucial for identifying precursory failure indicators, according to the generic dynamics of the precursory failure regime in granular systems. We select three different monitored slow-moving landslides as test cases. We employ an error correction cointegration vector autoregression model together with an exogenous regressor to encode historical spatiotemporal landslide dynamics and predict displacement at multiple locations by considering the historical landslide motion and relationship with external triggers. Displacement residuals are obtained by computing the difference between predicted and measured displacement for a given historical calibration time window. Threshold values for the displacement residuals are determined by analyzing the historical distribution of these residuals. Lastly, persistence in time of the threshold exceedance and the number of monitoring points that exceed the threshold at the same time are considered to encode the group dynamics. This approach offers several advantages, including the effective identification of critical regime shifts, adaptability, and transferability, and it introduces regime shift information into local landslide early warning systems. This approach can enhance confidence in the resultant alert, particularly when integrated with conventional alert systems, thereby improving the reliability of landslide warning systems.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Bernardie S, Desramaut N, Malet JP, Gourlay M, Grandjean G (2015) Prediction of changes in landslide rates induced by rainfall. Landslides 12:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0495-8
2. Blasques F, Koopman SJ, Nientker M (2022) A time-varying parameter model for local explosions. J Econom 227:65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.05.008
3. Brezzi L, Carraro E, Pasa D, Teza G, Cola S, Galgaro A (2021) Post-collapse evolution of a rapid landslide from sequential analysis with FE and SPH-based models. Geosciences (basel) 11:364. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11090364
4. Catani F, Segoni S (2022) Prediction and forecasting of mass-movements. Treatise Geomorphol 531–545:531. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818234-5.00099-7
5. Centro Protezione Civile Università degli Studi di Firenze (2021) Monitoraggio e valutazione della frana di Pomarico (MT) tramite dati interferometrici da terra. Unpublished report of monitoring system. (in Italian)