Abstract
AbstractMany research questions concern treatment effects on outcomes that can recur several times in the same individual. For example, medical researchers are interested in treatment effects on hospitalizations in heart failure patients and sports injuries in athletes. Competing events, such as death, complicate causal inference in studies of recurrent events because once a competing event occurs, an individual cannot have more recurrent events. Several statistical estimands have been studied in recurrent event settings, with and without competing events. However, the causal interpretations of these estimands, and the conditions that are required to identify these estimands from observed data, have yet to be formalized. Here we use a formal framework for causal inference to formulate several causal estimands in recurrent event settings, with and without competing events. When competing events exist, we clarify when commonly used classical statistical estimands can be interpreted as causal quantities from the causal mediation literature, such as (controlled) direct effects and total effects. Furthermore, we show that recent results on interventionist mediation estimands allow us to define new causal estimands with recurrent and competing events that may be of particular clinical relevance in many subject matter settings. We use causal directed acyclic graphs and single world intervention graphs to illustrate how to reason about identification conditions for the various causal estimands based on subject matter knowledge. Furthermore, using results on counting processes, we show that our causal estimands and their identification conditions, which are articulated in discrete time, converge to classical continuous time counterparts in the limit of fine discretizations of time. We propose estimators and establish their consistency for the various identifying functionals. Finally, we use the proposed estimators to compute the effect of blood pressure lowering treatment on the recurrence of acute kidney injury using data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Medicine
Reference60 articles.
1. Aalen OO, Ørnulf Borgan, Gjessing HK (2008) Survival and event history analysis. Statistics for biology and health. Springer, New York
2. Aalen OO, Cook RJ, Røysland K (2015) Does cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect? Lifetime Data Anal 21(4):579–593
3. Andersen PK, Angst J, Ravn H (2019) Modeling marginal features in studies of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event. Lifetime Data Anal 25(4):681–695
4. Anker SD, McMurray JJV (2012) Time to move on from ‘time-to-first’: should all events be included in the analysis of clinical trials? Eur Heart J 33(22):2764–2765
5. Brunton LL, Knollmann BC, Hilal-Dandan R (2018) Goodman and Gilman’s: the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McGraw-Hill’s Access Medicine, 13th edn. McGraw-Hill Education LLC, New York
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献