The Challenge of Labour
Publisher
Macmillan Education UK
Reference9 articles.
1. Barry McGill, ‘Francis Schnadhorst and Liberal Party Organisation’, Journal of Modern History, vol. xxxiv, 1962, pp. 19–39. 2. Henry Pelling, ‘The Politics of the Osborne Judgement’, Historical Journal 25, December 1982, pp. 889–909. 3. The situation at Hanley was complicated because Outhwaite was regarded as being too radical by some sections of the national Liberal leadership. The by-elections are analysed more fully in Roy Douglas, ‘Labour in Decline, 1910–14’, in K. D. Brown (ed.), Essays in Anti-Labour History, pp. 105–125. See also, P. F. Clarke, ‘The Electoral Position of the Liberal and Labour Parties, 1910–1914’, English Historical Review, October 1975, pp. 828–36; Martin Petter, ‘The Progressive Alliance’, History, vol. 58, 1973, pp. 45–59. 4. Tanner, Political Change, provides the most balanced assessment. Attempts have been made to show that Labour’s growth before 1914 was artificially hampered by the restrictions of the electoral system, notably in H. C. G. Matthew, R. McKibbin and J. Kay, ‘The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party’, English Historical Review xci, June 1976, pp. 723–52 5. P. F. Clarke, ‘Liberals, Labour and the Franchise’, EHR xcii, October 1977, pp. 582–90
|
|