1. For More’s shared agendas with Wollstonecraft, see Gary Kelly, Women, Writing and Revolution, 1790–1827 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 27–9; Janet Todd (ed.), Mary Wollstonecraft, Political Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. xxi. For critiques of aristocratic mores, see Donna Andrew, ‘The Code of Honour and its Critics: the Opposition to Duelling in England 1780–1850’, Social History, 5 (1980), pp. 409–34; idem, ‘“Adultery à-la-mode”: Privilege, the Law and Attitudes to Adultery 1770–1809’, History, 82 (1997), pp. 5–23.
2. Mitzi Myers, ‘Reform or Ruin: “A Revolution in Female Manners”’, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 11 (1982), pp. 199–216; idem, ‘Hannah More’s Tracts for the Times: Social Fiction and Female Ideology’, in Mary Anne Schofield and Cecilia Macheski (eds), Fetter’d or Free? British Women Novelists, 1670–1815 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 1986), pp. 264–84; idem, ‘“A Peculiar Protection”: Hannah More and the Cultural Politics of the Blagdon Controversy’, in Beth Fowkes Tobin (ed.), History, Gender and Eighteenth-Century Literature (Athens, GA, and London: University of Georgia Press, 1994), pp. 227–57; Susan Pedersen, ‘Hannah More Meets Simple Simon: Tracts, Chapbooks and Popular Culture in Late Eighteenth-Century England’, Journal of British Studies, 25 (1986), pp. 84–113; Gerald Newman, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987), pp. 234–5; Beth Fowkes Tobin, Superintending the Poor: Charitable Ladies and Paternal Landlords in British Fiction, 1770–1860 (New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 1993), pp. 109–12.
3. Kathryn Sutherland, ‘Hannah More’s Counter-Revolutionary Feminism’, in Kelvin Everest (ed.), Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution (Milton Keynes and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press, 1991), pp. 27–63.
4. See, for example, Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 1992), pp. 274–6; Mark Philp, ‘Vulgar Conservatism 1792–3’, English Historical Review, 90 (1995), pp. 42–69.
5. See Elaine Chalus, ‘“That Epidemical Madness”: Women and Electoral Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century’, in Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus (eds), Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representations and Responsibilities (London: Longman, 1997), pp. 151–78, for a discussion of women’s involvement in the electoral process.