Abstract
AbstractGeoconservation and geoethics are two emergent domains in geosciences. During the last decade, both topics have increasingly gained the attention of geoscientists and the society, but the main geoethical dilemmas related to the conservation and management of geoheritage are not clearly identified yet. This work aims at providing an overview on the meaning and scope of geoethics and how it intersects geoheritage and the practice of geoconservation. Some case studies—many of which are under current debate and have a high potential as geoeducational resources—are presented for addressing ethical, social and cultural settings as well as dilemmas affecting geoheritage. We find that there are particular cases (mostly concerning the trade of fossils, and in particular the growing concern about activities that rely on amber from Myanmar) for which a clear dichotomy of views makes them much more problematic and complex. These cases deserve more suitable legal frameworks that help implement more balanced ethical standards and practice guidelines for geoconservation, guarantee human rights and needs in relation to that heritage and contribute to the advancement of geosciences. Particular attention is given to palaeontological heritage, as fossils are among the most threatened elements of the Earth’s diversity and are in need of more effective and statutory protection measures. In the context of geoethics applied to palaeontological heritage, and given the need of a clear understanding of what ethics in palaeontology means, a new concept—palaeontoethics—is proposed and formally defined.
Funder
Government of Aragon
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Nature and Landscape Conservation,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference69 articles.
1. Alcalá L, Morales J (1994) Towards a definition of Spanish palaeontological heritage. In: O’Halloran D, Green C, Harley M, Stanley M, Knill J (eds) Geological and Landscape Conservation. Geological Society, London, pp 57–61
2. Alegret L, Ortiz S (2010) El corte de Zumaya (España): registro de los foraminíferos bentónicos del Paleógeno inferior. Rev Mex Cienc Geol 27:477–489
3. Alegret L, Ortiz S, Orue-Etxebarria X, Bernaola G, Baceta JI, Monechi S, Apellaniz E, Pujalte V (2009) The paleocene-eocene thermal maximum: new data from the microfossil turnover at the Zumaia section, Spain. Palaios 24:318–328
4. Antić A, Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2020) Applying the values of geoethics for sustainable speleotourism development. Geoheritage 12:73
5. Arenillas I, Arz JA, Molina E (2004) A new high-resolution planktic foraminiferal zonation and subzonation for the lower Danian. Lethaia 37:79–95
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献