Enhancing Geosıte Accessibility Assessment: A New Mcdm Model

Author:

Bilgiç Sevgi,Karadeniz Enes,Selman Er

Abstract

AbstractGeosites are significant geological heritage areas that serve as field laboratories for researchers. They offer insights into geological processes that have occurred from the past to the present and hold high potential for geotourism. To preserve and make geosites sustainable, their accessibility is a prerequisite. For this purpose, a model consisting of various parameters was developed in accordance with the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, identifying 183 geosite areas that have been determined by experts and are subjects of literature. As a result, four evaluation criteria were established, including accessibility, access to service/attractiveness areas, scientific importance, and geomorphological features. Taking these parameters into account, a collective evaluation map was obtained using GIS-based AHP, drawing upon literature and expert opinions. The study concluded that the most critical parameter for accessibility to geosites is accessibility itself, accounting for 50% of the importance. Other parameters have influenced the accessibility of geosites in the following order of importance: 25% land, 15% scientific importance, and 10% service/attractiveness. Consequently, the areas where accessibility to geosites in Türkiye is most convenient are those with the highest road density. Road density, in turn, exhibits a pattern based on the characteristics of topography, population, and trade factors. Additionally, a parallel outcome emerged between areas that are more suitable in terms of these factors and the density of geosites. As a validation of the newly created model, the accessibility of Türkiye's areas recognized by UNESCO was found to be very high, indicating that the model is a suitable and convenient method that can be applied to different areas.

Funder

Inonu University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference73 articles.

1. Alexandrowicz Z (1998) Representative geosites of Poland and their status of conservation. GeolBalc 28(3–4):37–42. https://doi.org/10.52321/GeolBalc.28.3-4.37

2. Alexandrowiez Z (1999) Draft Candidate List of Geosites Representative of Central of Europe. Geological Institute Special Papers 2:9–14

3. Altınay Özdemir Ö, Kızılırmak İ (2019) Jeolojik miras alanlarının jeoturizm açısından incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 12(63):947–956

4. Barettino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (2000) Geological Heritage: Its Conservation and Management. Instituto Tecnológico GeoMinero de España. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fGAtSnF3n_QC

5. Birch CPD, Oom SP, Beecham JA (2007) Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecol Model 206(3):347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.041

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3