Abstract
AbstractThis paper used a small stylized nonlinear three-country macroeconomic model of a monetary union to analyse the interactions between fiscal (governments) and monetary (common central bank) policymakers. The three fiscal players were divided into a financially stable core and a less stable periphery. The periphery itself consisted of two players with different perceptions of the trade-off between fiscal stability and output growth. Using the OPTGAME algorithm, solutions were calculated for two game strategies: one cooperative (Pareto optimal) and one non-cooperative game type (the Nash game for the feedback information pattern). Introducing a negative demand shock, the performance of different coalition options between players were analysed. A higher level of cooperation leads in general to a better overall outcome of the game, however, with highly varying burdens to be borne by the players.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Economics and Econometrics
Reference20 articles.
1. Aguiar, M., Amador, M., Farhi, E., & Gopinath, G. (2015). Coordination and crisis in monetary unions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1727–1779.
2. Andersen, T. (2005). Fiscal stabilization policy in a monetary union with inflation targeting. Journal of Macroeconomics, 27(1), 1–29.
3. Basar, T. (1989). Time consistency and robustness of equilibria in non-cooperative dynamic games. In Contributions to economic analysis, (Vol. 181 pp. 9–54). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Basar, T., & Olsder, G. (1995). Dynamic noncooperative game theory, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.
5. Beetsma, R., & Jensen, H. (2005). Monetary and fiscal policy interactions in a micro-founded model of a monetary union. Journal of International Economics, 67(2), 320–352.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献