Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of the ESR-iGuide Decision Support Tool in Optimizing CT Imaging Referral Appropriateness

Abstract

AbstractRadiology referral quality impacts patient care, yet factors influencing quality are poorly understood. This study assessed the quality of computed tomography (CT) referrals, identified associated characteristics, and evaluated the ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool’s ability to optimize referrals. A retrospective review analyzed 300 consecutive CT referrals from an acute care hospital. Referral quality was evaluated on a 5-point scale by three expert reviewers (inter-rater reliability κ = 0.763–0.97). The ESR-iGuide tool provided appropriateness scores and estimated radiation exposure levels for the actual referred exams and recommended exams. Scores were compared between actual and recommended exams. Associations between ESR-iGuide scores and referral characteristics, including the specialty of the ordering physician (surgical vs. non-surgical), were explored. Of the referrals, 67.1% were rated as appropriate. The most common exams were head and abdomen/pelvis CTs. The ESR-iGuide deemed 70% of the actual referrals “usually appropriate” and found that the recommended exams had lower estimated radiation exposure compared to the actual exams. Logistic regression analysis showed that non-surgical physicians were more likely to order inappropriate exams compared to surgical physicians. Over one-third of the referrals showed suboptimal quality in the unstructured system. The ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool identified opportunities to optimize appropriateness and reduce radiation exposure. Implementation of such a tool warrants consideration to improve communication and maximize patient care quality.