Abstract
AbstractOne can intend the actions of others, even when one believes such actions are not under one’s control. Call the objects of intentions “ends”; the ends that consist (partly or wholly) of other people’s actions “social”; and the ends that consist of things one believes one cannot control “recalcitrant”. The thesis, then, is that one can intend recalcitrant social ends. I present a positive argument in favor of this idea, and then argue against some purported conditions on the possible content of intentions that would rule out the possibility of intending such ends. The positive argument is the following: intentions are realized by a certain cluster of dispositions. One can come to be so disposed towards recalcitrant social ends. So one can come to be disposed toward such ends in the manner that realizes an intention. So one can intend recalcitrant social ends. The conditions against which I argue are known in the literature as the Own Action Condition, the Control Condition, and the Settle Condition. I present cases where, intuitively, agents genuinely intend ends that would be ruled out by these conditions.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Adams, F. (1986). Intention and intentional action: The simple view. Mind and Language,1(4), 281–301.
2. Adams, F., & Mele, A. (1989). The role of intention in intentional action. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,19(4), 511–531.
3. Baier, A. C. (1970). Act and intent. The Journal of Philosophy,67(19), 648–658.
4. Brand, M. (1984). Intending and acting. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献