Abstract
AbstractI have two aims for the present paper, one narrow and one broad. The narrow aim is to show that a class of data originally described by Lynsey Wolter (That’s that; the semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases, PhD thesis, University of California at Santa Cruz, 2006) empirically undermine the leading treatments of complex demonstratives that have been described in the literature. The broader aim of the paper is to show that Wolter demonstratives, as I will call the constructions I focus on, are a threat not just to existing treatments, but to any possible theory that retains the uncontroversial assumptions that relative clauses always form a constituent with the nouns they modify, and that semantic composition proceeds sequentially and locally, with the inputs to interpretation having the structure syntax tells us they do.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Bach, E., & Cooper, R. (1978). The NP-S analysis of relative clauses and compositional semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2(1), 145–150.
2. Braun, D. (2008). Complex demonstratives and their singular contents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 57–99.
3. Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. California: University of California Press.
4. Comorovski, I. (2007). Constituent questions and the copula of specification. In I. Comorovski & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (pp. 49–78). Berlin: Springer.
5. Cooper, R. (1975). Montague’s semantic theory and transformational syntax. PhD thesis, University of Massachussetts.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献