Abstract
AbstractThe paper develops the idea that institutions are enablers. However, they do not only enable individuals and collectives to achieve their goals; first and foremost, they enable individuals and collectives to have a goal, to select and recognize certain possible states of affairs as targets of action, and as a result, to have a demand – especially a demand for further institutions. I make the case that properly functioning institutions are dedicated to making these states of affairs epistemically acquaintable. What I will stress in particular is that acquaintance is first realized in the form of questions, which are linguistic expressions of acts of problematization. However, I will discuss less what an individual subject questions, but rather what the social dynamic of questioning is. This dynamic will be conceptualized in terms of epistemic dependence, and it will be singled out as the dynamic that gives rise to institutions.
Funder
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D. (2006). Modeling Inefficient Institutions, In R. Blundell, W. Newey, T. Persson (eds.) Advances in Economic Theory, Proceedings of 2005 World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 341–380.
2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2013). Why nations fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
3. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2019). The narrow Corridor. States, Societies, and the fate of Liberty (pp. 365–389). Penguin Books.
4. Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2021). Institutional change and institutional persistence. In A. Bisin, & G. Federico (Eds.), The handbook of historical economics. Elsevier Academic Press.
5. Adler, P. S. (1993). The Learning Bureaucracy: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (15 vol., pp. 111–194). JAI Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献