Abstract
AbstractI am aware of the tree and its leaves, but am I aware of my awareness of these things? When I try to introspect my awareness, I just find myself attending to objects and their properties. This observation is known as the ‘transparency of experience’. On the other hand, I seem to directly know that I am aware. Given the first observation, it is not clear how I know that I am aware. Fred Dretske thought that the problem was so acute that he issued the challenge of answering ‘How do you know that you are not a zombie?’ I propose that a view found in the Advaita Vedanta, that awareness is self-luminous, reconciles these two observations. I understand self-luminosity as the thesis that: (1) I am implicitly aware of my awareness and (2) I am phenomenally aware of a distinct phenomenal character of my awareness. In support of the first claim, that I apparently only attend to objects in the world when introspecting perceptual experience, suggests that I do not know my awareness explicitly, but rather that I must know it implicitly. In support of the second claim, I argue that the mere fact that I am perceptually conscious is not sufficient to allow me to know that I am perceptually conscious. In particular, the qualities I am perceptually aware of do not tell me that I aware of them, rather they just seem to be properties of objects. I also assess whether strategies for responding to Cartesian sceptical scenarios can be employed against Dretske’s consciousness scepticism. I argue that these strategies either fail to distinguish me from a zombie or they do not adequately describe my epistemic situation. By contrast to other accounts, if awareness has its own distinct phenomenal character, then it cannot be considered to be a prima facie property of the world, hence the self-luminosity of awareness provides a plausible account of how I know that I’m not a zombie.
Funder
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5(6), 679–685.
2. Albahari, M. (2006). Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered Illusion of Self. Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Albahari, M. (2009). Witness-Consciousness: Its definition, appearance and reality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(1), 62–84.
4. Albahari, M. (2011). Nirvana and ownerless consciousness. In M. Siderits, E. Thompson, & D. Zahavi (Eds.), Self, No Self? Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions (pp. 79–113). Oxford University Press.
5. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227–247.