Abstract
AbstractWe demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its procurement. On our analysis, mathematics’ sole explanatory contribution to the procurement of explanatory generality is to make counterfactual information about physical dependencies easier to grasp and reason with for creatures like us. This gives precise content to key intuitions traded in the debate, regarding mathematics’ procurement of explanatory generality, and adjudicates unambiguously in favour of the nominalist, at least as far as explanatory generality is concerned.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Baker, A. (2005). Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena. Mind, 114(454), 223–238.
2. Baker, A. (2017). Mathematics and explanatory generality. Philosophia Mathematica, 25(2), 194–209.
3. Baker, A., & Colyvan, M. (2011). Indexing and mathematical explanation. Philosophia Mathematica, 19(3), 323–334.
4. Baron, S., Colyvan, M., & Ripley, D. (2017). How mathematics can make a difference. Philosophers’ Imprint, 17, 1–19.
5. Bokulich, A. (2016). Fiction as a vehicle for truth: Moving beyond the ontic conception. The Monist, 99(3), 260–279.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献