Blurring Boundaries: Carnap, Quine, and the Internal–External Distinction-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Blurring Boundaries: Carnap, Quine, and the Internal–External Distinction

Published:2016-10-13 Issue:4 Volume:82 Page:873-890
ISSN:0165-0106
Container-title:Erkenntnis
language:en
Short-container-title:Erkenn

Author:

Verhaegh Sander

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NL)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Logic,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-016-9848-0/fulltext.html

Reference60 articles.

1. Alspector-Kelly, M. (2001). On Quine on Carnap on ontology. Philosophical Studies, 102(1), 93–122.

2. Berto, F., & Plebani, F. (2015). Ontology and metaontology: A contemporary guide. London: Bloomsbury.

3. Bird, G. (1995). Carnap and Quine: Internal and external questions. Erkenntnis, 42(1), 41–64.

4. Carnap, R. (1928). Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie. Berlin, Schlachtensee: Weltkreis. Pseudoproblems in Philosophy (trans: George, R.). Berkeley: University of California Press (1967).

5. Carnap, R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache. The logical syntax of language (trans. Smeaton A.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Social Science Philosophy Behind Data Analysis With Special Reference to Philosophical Perception;Social Research Methodology and Publishing Results;2023-03-10

2. Can Science Escape Metaphysics? On Chakravartty’s Scientific Ontology;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2023-02-25

3. A pragmatic approach to the ontology of models;Synthese;2021-02-26

4. SUSAN STEBBING AND THE TRUTHMAKER APPROACH TO METAPHYSICS;LOG ANAL;2021

5. Carnap and Quine: Analyticity, Naturalism, and the Elimination of Metaphysics;The Monist;2018-10-01