Abstract
AbstractSome plausibly necessary a posteriori theoretical claims include ‘water is H2O’, ‘gold is the element with atomic number 79’, and ‘cats are animals’. In this paper I challenge the necessity of the third claim. I argue that there are possible worlds in which cats exist, but are not animals. Under any of the species concepts currently accepted in biology, organisms do not belong essentially to their species. This is equally true of their ancestors. In phylogenetic systematics, monophyletic clades such as the animal kingdom are composed of an ancestral stem species and all of its descendants. If the stem species had not existed, neither would the clade. Thus it could have been the case that all the organisms which actually belong to the animal kingdom might have existed yet not have been animals.
Funder
British Society for the Philosophy of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Bokulich, A. (2020). Understanding scientific types: holotypes, stratotypes, and measurement prototypes. Biology & Philosophy, 35(5), 1–28
2. Cantino, P. D., & de Queiroz, K. (Eds.). (2020). PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.)
3. Dennett, D. C. (2017). Darwin and the Overdue Demise of Essentialism. In D. L. Smith (Ed.), How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism (pp. 9–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)
4. de Queiroz, K., & Gauthier, J. (1994). Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9(1), 27–31
5. de Queiroz, K. (2007). Toward an integrated system of clade names. Systematic Biology, 56(6), 956–974
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献