Abstract
AbstractThe idea that sentences can be closer or further apart in meaning is highly intuitive. Not only that, it is also a pillar of logic, semantic theory and the philosophy of science, and follows from other commitments about similarity. The present paper proposes a novel way of comparing the ‘distance’ between two pairs of propositions. We define ‘$$p_1$$
p
1
is closer in meaning to $$p_2$$
p
2
than $$p_3$$
p
3
is to $$p_4$$
p
4
’ and thereby give a precise account of comparative propositional similarity facts. Notably, our definition eschews metric assumptions, which are unrealistic in most applications of interest.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Bigelow, J. (1976). Semantics of probability. Synthese, 36, 459–72.
2. Blumson, B. (2018). Distance and dissimilarity. Philosophical Papers (vol. 48, pp. 211–239).
3. Čech, E. (1969). Point sets (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Academia.
4. Davidson, D. (1976). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Hilpinen, R. (1976). Approximate truth and truthlikeness. In M. Przelecki, K. Szaniawski, & R. Wojcicki (Eds.), Formal methods in the methodology of the empirical sciences (pp. 19–42). Kufstein: Reidel.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献