Abstract
AbstractThe thesis of Weak Unrestricted Composition says that every pair of objects has a fusion. This thesis has been argued by Contessa (Analysis 72(3):455–457, 2012) and Smith (Erkenntnis 84(1):41–55, 2019) to be compatible with the world being junky and hence to evade an argument against the necessity of Strong Unrestricted Composition proposed by Bohn (Analysis 69(1):27–31, 2009a, Philos Q 59(235):193–201, 2009b). However, neither Weak Unrestricted Composition alone nor the different variants of it that have been proposed in the literature can provide us with a satisfying answer to the special composition question, or so we will argue. We will then go on to explore an alternative family of purely mereological rules in the vicinity of Weak Unrestricted Composition, Cardinal Composition: A plurality of pairwise non-overlapping objects composes an object iff the objects in the plurality are of cardinality smaller than $$\kappa $$
κ
. As we will show, all the instances for infinite $$\kappa $$
κ
s determine fusion and are compatible with junk, and every instance for a $$\kappa > \aleph _0$$
κ
>
ℵ
0
is furthermore compatible with gunk and dense chains of parthood.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Bohn, E. D. (2009). An argument against the necessity of unrestricted composition. Analysis, 69(1), 27–31.
2. Bohn, E. D. (2009). Must there be a top level? Philosophical Quarterly, 59(235), 193–201.
3. Bohn, E. D. (2018). Indefinitely descending ground. In R. Bliss & G. Priest (Eds.), Reality and its structure. Oxford University Press.
4. Bostock, D. (1979). Logic and arithmetic: Rational and irrational numbers (Vol. 2). Oxford: Claredon Press.
5. Cameron, R. P. (2007). The contingency of composition. Philosophical Studies, 136(1), 99–121.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献