Abstract
AbstractThose who are risk averse with respect to money, and thus turn down some gambles with positive monetary expectations, are nevertheless often willing to accept bundles involving multiple such gambles. Therefore, it might seem that such people should become more willing to accept a risky but favourable gamble if they put it in context with the collection of gambles that they predict they will be faced with in the future. However, it turns out that when a risk averse person adopts the long-term perspective, she faces a decision-problem that can be analysed as a noncooperative game between different “time-slices” of herself, where it is in the interest of each time-slice (given its prediction about other slices) to turn down the gamble with which it is faced. Hence, even if a risk averse but rational person manages to take the long-term perspective, she will, in the absence of what Hardin called “mutual coercion”, end up in a situation analogous to the “tragedy of the commons”.
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
2. Buchak, L. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Gauthier, D. (1996). Commitment and choice. In F. Farina, S. Vannucci, & F. Hahn (Eds.), Ethics, rationality, and economic behaviour (pp. 217–243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
5. Hedden, B. (2012). Options and the subjective ought. Philosophical Studies, 158(2), 343–360.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献