Abstract
AbstractInnovation represents one of the most crucial levers for regional prosperity and sectoral renewal. Additionally, it is applied to address challenges such as a sustainable transition and the battle against climate change. Since innovation is the result of cooperation between different actors with different backgrounds, the topic is increasingly studied from a systemic perspective. Here, not only internal cooperation but also cross-border connections between regions become important. While smart specialisation, a European policy for innovation and cohesion, highlights the role of interregional cooperation, practical manifestations and research on this aspect have remained limited so far. This article addresses this gap by discussing the relevance of interregional cooperation for knowledge creation and presents empirical evidence on cooperation between organisations in different European regions in the field of environmental sustainability. The underlying dataset was constructed from Horizon 2020 (H2020) research projects with Northern Germany as an exemplary set of regions chosen as the core of a social network analysis (SNA). The findings reveal that involvement in interregional projects is concentrated particularly in urban regions and correlates with GDP and population density. On the other hand, also organisations in regions with different structural characteristics are involved in interregional cooperation, and H2020 managed to introduce new cooperation patterns. Finally, the empirical data do not adequately match the regional smart specialisation strategies (S3) which raises questions on updating smart specialisation as a policy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference183 articles.
1. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & y León, M.D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63–74.
2. Alamsyah, A., Rahardjo, B., & Kuspriyanto (2013). Social network taxonomy based on graph representation. International Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship and small business. Bandung.
3. Angelis, J. (2021). Mission-oriented innovation policies: driving communities forward. EFIS Centre. Retrieved October 21, 2021, from https://www.efiscentre.eu/mission-oriented-innovation-policies-driving-communities-forward/
4. Asheim, B., & Herstad, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems, varieties of capitalism and non-local relations: Challenges from the globalising economy. In R. Boschma & R. Kloosterman (Eds.), Learning from Clusters: A Critical Assessment from an Economic-Geographical Perspective (pp. 169–201). Springer.
5. Asheim, B. T., Lawton Smith, H., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Policy, 45(7), 875–891.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献