Abstract
AbstractSeveral studies have examined the long-run effects of public and private R&D on TFP with mixed results. A common feature of these studies is that they measure public and private R&D activity using perpetual inventory stocks of public and private R&D capital, constructed under the assumption that the prices of GDP, public R&D, and private R&D move identically. This note argues that the results of these studies may be biased if the assumption of identical price movements is violated. The purpose and main contribution of this note is to estimate the long-run elasticities of TFP with respect to public and private R&D using both the stock of public/private R&D capital and an alternative measure of public/private R&D activity: the number of public/private sector researchers. In addition, this study contributes to the literature by developing a simple theoretical model that formalizes the intuition of how public and private R&D affect TFP, and by using both traditional and more recent panel methods. Contrary to previous studies, it is found—using numbers of researchers in the public and private sector—that there is strong evidence both of a significant positive long-run effect of both public and private R&D on TFP and of a greater effect of public R&D than private R&D. Consistent with the mixed evidence reported in the literature, it is also found that the use of public and private R&D stocks yields mixed results regarding the long-run effects of public and private R&D on TFP.
Funder
Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference40 articles.
1. Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Hemmings, P. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: Panel data evidence for the OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33(2), 9–56.
2. Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917–942.
3. Bengoa, M., Martínez-San Román, V., & Pérez, P. (2017). Do R&D activities matter for productivity? A regional spatial approach assessing the role of human and social capital. Economic Modelling, 60(C), 448–461.
4. Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: A survey. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of panel data (pp. 3–45). Oxford University Press.
5. Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., & Raissi, M. (2016). Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Advances in Econometrics, 36, 85–135.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献