Author:
Parycek Peter,Schmid Verena,Novak Anna-Sophie
Abstract
AbstractIntegrating artificial intelligence (AI) systems into administrative procedures can revolutionize the way processes are conducted and fundamentally change established forms of action and organization in administrative law. However, implementing AI in administrative procedures requires a comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities and limitations of different systems, including considerations of transparency and data availability. Data are a crucial factor in the operation of AI systems and the validity of their predictions. It is essential to ensure that the data used to train AI algorithms are extensive, representative, and free of bias. Transparency is also an important aspect establishing trust and reliability in AI systems, particularly regarding the potential for transparent representation in rule-based and machine-learning AI systems. This paper examines the potential and challenges that arise from integrating AI into administrative procedures. In addition, the paper offers a nuanced perspective on current developments in artificial intelligence and provides a conceptual framework for its potential applications in administrative procedures. Beyond this, the paper highlights essential framework conditions that require continuous monitoring to ensure optimal results in practice.
Funder
Danube University Krems University for Continuing Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference79 articles.
1. Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2021). Decision-makers processing of AI algorithmic advice: Automation bias versus selective adherence. arXiv.
2. Aoki, N. (2020). An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101490.
3. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 289, 103387.
4. Beierle, C., & Kern-Isberner, G. (2019). Regelbasierte Systeme. In C. Beierle, & G. Kern-Isberner, Methoden wissensbasierter Systeme. Springer.
5. Berger, C., & Kolain, M. (2021). Recht digital: schwer verständlich »by design« und allenfalls teilweise automatisierbar? kompetenzzentrum öffentliche IT.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献