Farmer-Centred Multi-stakeholder Platforms: From Iterative Approach to Conceptual Embedding

Author:

van Ewijk EdithORCID,Ataa-Asantewaa Martha,Asubonteng Kwabena O.ORCID,Van Leynseele Yves P. B.ORCID,Derkyi MercyORCID,Laven Anna,Ros-Tonen Mirjam A. F.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractResearch on knowledge exchange in multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) within smallholder farmer settings has primarily focused on adaptive designs and increased innovation rates. This paper addresses a knowledge gap by providing insights into the limited understanding of how knowledge sharing in MSPs can be inclusive of smallholder farmers’ knowledge. It shares experiences with a farmer-centred approach to learning and knowledge-sharing with smallholder farmers in Ghana and places this iteratively developed approach within a theoretical perspective. We relate the farmer-centred approach to five design principles inspired by human-centred design rules and inclusive development dimensions. Findings from observations, interviews, and focus group discussions illustrate how the farmer-centred approach creates multifunctional spaces for peer-to-peer learning, interaction with institutional actors, and network building (design principle 1). Prior farmer-centred research ensured that themes addressed were relevant to participant farmers and brought their innovations ‘from below’ to the table (design principles 2 and 3). A majority representation of farmers, facilitation by local researchers, and organising platform meetings at the district level created a safe space for farmers to share their knowledge and feel included and empowered (design principle 4). Several local institutional actors took ownership of the platform principles, which created opportunities for their manifestation in future collaborations with farmers (design principle 5). However, challenges remain in engaging crucial actors from higher scale levels and reducing donor dependency. The design principles presented in this paper contribute to the genuine inclusion of farmers’ knowledge and innovations. We recommend government agencies at the national and district levels incorporate these design principles into their work plans and budgets and prioritise farmers’ knowledge and innovation capacity for inclusive learning and knowledge co-creation.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference89 articles.

1. Adjei-Nsiah, S., Leeuwis, C., Giller, K., & Kuyper, T. (2008). Action research on alternative land tenure arrangements in Wenchi, Ghana: Learning from ambiguous social dynamics and self-organised institutional innovation. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9133-1

2. Adjei-Nsiah, S., & Klerkx, L. (2016). Innovation platforms and institutional change: The case of small-scale palm oil processing in Ghana. Cahiers Agricultures, 25, 65005. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016046

3. Adolwa, I., Schwarze, S., Bellwood-Howard, I., Schareika, N., & Buerkert, A. (2017). A comparative analysis of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in Kenya and Ghana: Sustainable agricultural intensification in the rural-urban interface. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9725-0

4. Adu-Acheampong, R., Jiggins, J., Quartey, E., Karikari, N., Jonfia-Essien, W., Quarshie, E., Osei-Fosu, P., Amuzu, M., Afari-Mintah, C., Ofori-Frimpong, K., Owusu-Manu, M., Eku, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Quarmine, W., & Acquah, F. (2017). An innovation platform for institutional change in Ghana’s cocoa sector. Cahier Agriculture, 26, 35002. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017016

5. Akpo, E., Crane, T., Vissoh, P., & Tossou, R. (2015). Co-production of knowledge in multi-stakeholder processes: Analysing joint experimentation as social learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21, 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.939201

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3