Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we study the problem of cost optimisation of individual-based institutional incentives (reward, punishment, and hybrid) for guaranteeing a certain minimal level of cooperative behaviour in a well-mixed, finite population. In this scheme, the individuals in the population interact via cooperation dilemmas (Donation Game or Public Goods Game) in which institutional reward is carried out only if cooperation is not abundant enough (i.e., the number of cooperators is below a threshold $$1\le t\le N-1$$
1
≤
t
≤
N
-
1
, where N is the population size); and similarly, institutional punishment is carried out only when defection is too abundant. We study analytically the cases $$t=1$$
t
=
1
for the reward incentive under the small mutation limit assumption and two different initial states, showing that the cost function is always non-decreasing. We derive the neutral drift and strong selection limits when the intensity of selection tends to zero and infinity, respectively. We numerically investigate the problem for other values of t and for population dynamics with arbitrary mutation rates.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Royal Society
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Atkins PWB, Wilson DS, Hayes SC (2019) Prosocial: Using evolutionary science to build productive, equitable, and collaborative groups. New Harbinger Publications
2. Capraro V, Perc M (2021) Mathematical foundations of moral preferences. J R Soc Interface 18(175):20200880
3. Chen X, Perc M (2014) Optimal distribution of incentives for public cooperation in heterogeneous interaction environments. Front Behav Neurosci 8:248
4. Cimpeanu T, Perret C, Han TA (2021) Cost-efficient interventions for promoting fairness in the ultimatum game. Knowl-Based Syst 233:107545
5. Cimpeanu T, Santos FC, Han TA (2023) Does spending more always ensure higher cooperation? An analysis of institutional incentives on heterogeneous networks. Dyn Games Appl 1:1–20