Abstract
AbstractA paradox concerning age exists in early childhood education (ECE) across many countries today, evident in the literature, curriculum, policy, funding, and provision. This paradox comprises two distinct approaches that call for either a specialised developmental approach to discrete age groups or a generic attitude concerning childhoods with no age distinction at all. This article traces the presence and impact of the paradox of age through an Australian study comprising two components: a review of the literature concerning age; and, a survey undertaken in two states where different treatments of age were evident: NSW and Victoria—with a particular interest in what was happening for three-year-olds. 171 responses were received 102 (NSW) and 69 (Victoria). The review of the literature generated four main themes that when considered in relation to the survey responses revealed the tendency of ECE researchers, policymakers, and educators to situate children within a “discourse of becoming” that focusses attention towards children’s maturity and skills, and school readiness. While this discourse has been used productively, its prevalence in this study suggests that many children attending ECE services are likely to experience learning environments that do not always acknowledge the importance of the here and now, or the wealth of experience and knowledge they bring to these environments. This calls attention to the attitudes and assumptions of educators themselves concerning the treatment of younger learners; as well as the constraints and opportunities that policymakers provide for effective provision, and that influence both the nature of and access to ECE.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education
Reference45 articles.
1. Ansari, A., Purtell, K., & Gershoff, E. (2016). Classroom age composition and the school readiness of 3- and 4-year-olds in the head start program. Psychological Science, 27(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615610882
2. Ansari, A., & Purtell, K. M. (2018). Continuity and changes in classroom age composition and achievement in head start. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 58, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.07.002
3. Ansari, A., & Pianta, R. (2019). Classroom age composition and the early learning of pre-schoolers. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514356
4. Australian Childcare Alliance, New South Wales. (2019). Submission to the review of the universal access national partnership. https://nsw.childcarealliance.org.au/images/Documents/Submissions/2019-10-06_-_Submission_to_Nous_Group_re_UNAP_Review-merged-pages.pdf
5. Australian Childcare Alliance, New South Wales. (2020). NSW Government’s free preschool decision exposes own massive and unfair treatment and inconsistencies. https://nsw.childcarealliance.org.au/news/805-nsw-government-s-free-preschools-decision-exposes-own-massive-and-unfair-treatment-and-inconsistencies
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献