Abstract
AbstractThe ongoing refinement of bearing capacity equations remains pivotal in soil mechanics and foundation engineering, reflecting its critical role in ensuring design efficacy and construction safety. This study conducts a thorough evaluation of classical bearing capacity methods—Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Vesic, and Hansen—and methods included in various design standards, such as EN1997:2004, prEN1997:2023, GEO, AASHTO, FHWA, and API. It explores the performance and applicability of these approaches, identifying areas for potential improvement. In response to identified challenges, the paper proposes the integration of a unified depth factor. This new factor is designed to be applicable across all N-terms, providing a more versatile and accurate tool for bearing capacity predictions. Unlike the original depth factors unique to each method, which may not fully address complex soil and footing conditions, the unified depth factor is developed to enhance prediction accuracy for a wide range of conditions, including both flexible and rigid footings under varying flow rules (ψ = 0 and ψ = φ). This depth factor corrects for modeling errors, emphasizing the importance of pairing the correct set of N-factors with their corresponding depth factor. By offering a singular depth factor that aligns with the outcomes of finite element analysis, this paper not only simplifies the computational process but also enhances the accuracy of bearing capacity predictions across a diverse range of soil conditions and footing types. The comparative analysis, based on finite element analysis, validates the proposed method’s effectiveness, showcasing its potential to significantly refine foundation design practices by comparing it with both traditional and newly developed depth factors.
Funder
Cyprus University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. AASHTO (2020) LRFD bridge design specifications, 9th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
2. API (2000) Recommended practice 2A-WSD: planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms - working stress design, 21st edn. (Including Errata and Supplement up to August 2007). Washington, DC
3. Van Baars S (2018) The bearing capacity of shallow foundations on slopes. Numerical methods in geotechnical engineering IX. CRC Pres, pp 943–950
4. Benmebarek S, Saifi I, Benmebarek N (2017) Depth factors for undrained bearing capacity of circular footing by numerical approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9:761–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.01.003
5. Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36:65–78
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献