Author:
Masoud Alaa A.,Saad Ahmed M.,El Shafaey Osama N. H.
Abstract
Abstract
Sustainable innovative uses of underground space dictate the use of efficient and cost-effective techniques for geo-investigation and planning. This is now affordable with detailed three-dimensional (3D) geotechnical models of the soil properties that provide key source data to tackle the inherent complex nature of the subsurface beneath the densely urbanized cities. These models are vital for the sustainable cities safe urban expansion, tunneling, and optimal design of settlements. In the present research, 3D models were built using 189 samples collected from 92 boreholes distributed in Medina, Saudi Arabia. Models built included the database generated for soil varieties, classes of cohessionless, and cohesive soils based on their standard penetration test (SPT)-N value, along with rock quality designation (RQD) of the sound bedrocks, soil classes according to AASHTO, grain size analysis, Atterberg limits (liquid limits and plasticity index), the shear stress parameters (friction angle, Ø, and cohesion, c), the unconfined compression strength, and the soil water chemistry (pH, SO32−, and Cl−). Five soil varieties that were recognized ranged in size from clays to cobbles overlain by fills and underlain by basalt, rhyolite/granite, or andesite. AASHTO main soil types are A-1-b, A-2–4, and A-1-a. Out of the 189 samples, 174 were non-plastic while 15 samples showed an average liquid limit of 42.57% and plasticity index average of 9.92. Friction angle averaged 30.47° with c values average of 0.11. Unconfined compressive stress averaged 609 kg/cm2. Soil water chemistry clarified alkaline water (8–8.6 pH) with means of 0.1 for Cl− and SO32− contents. Geotechnical properties are spatially rendered in 3D and interpreted to better enable city planners predict and locate risk zones in the urban underground space.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference21 articles.
1. Aldiss DT, Black MG, Entwisle DC, Page DP, Terrington RL (2012) Benefits of a 3D geological model for major tunnelling works: an example from Farringdon, east central London. UK Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 45:405–414
2. Al-Shaibani AM, Lloyd JW, Abokhodair AA, Alahmari A (2007) Hydrogeological and quantitative groundwater assessment of the basaltic aquifer, Northern Harrat Rahat, Saudi Arabia. Arab Gulf J Sci Res 25:39–49
3. American Society for Testing and Materials Annual Book of ASTM Standards (ASTM), 2005. Vol. 04.08, Soil and Rock (I): D 420 –D 5611 and Vol. 04.09, Soil and Rock (II): D 5714-latest. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
4. Camp, V.E., Roobol, M.J., 1991. Geologic map of cenozoic lava field of Harrat Rahat, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Directorate General of Mineral Resources, Geosciences Map GM-123, Scale 250,000 with text.
5. CGS, 2006. Canadian Foundation Manual, 4th Edition. The Canadian Geotechnical Society c/o BiTech Publisher Ltd.