Abstract
AbstractInvasive plants offer an interesting and unconventional source of protein and the considerable investment made towards their eradication can potentially be salvaged through their revalorisation. To identify viable sources, effective and high-throughput screening methods are required, as well as efficient procedures to isolate these components. Rigorous assessment of low-cost, high-throughput screening assays for total sugar, phenolics and protein was performed, and ninhydrin, Lever and Fast Blue assays were found to be most suitable owing to high reliability scores and false positive errors less than 1%. These assays were used to characterise invasive Scottish plants such as Gorse (Ulex europeans), Broom (Cystisus scoparius) and Fireweed (Chamaenerion angustifolium). Protein extraction (alkali-, heat- and enzyme assisted) were tested on these plants, and further purification (acid and ethanol precipitation, as well as ultrafiltration) procedures were tested on Gorse, based on protein recovery values. Cellulase treatment and ethanol precipitation gave the highest protein recovery (64.0 ± 0.5%) and purity (96.8 ± 0.1%) with Gorse. The amino acid profile of the purified protein revealed high levels of essential amino acids (34.8 ± 0.0%). Comparison of results with preceding literature revealed a strong association between amino acid profiles and overall protein recovery with the extraction method employed. The final purity of the protein concentrates was closely associated to the protein content of the initial plant mass. Leaf protein extraction technology can effectively raise crop harvest indices, revalorise underutilised plants and waste streams.
Funder
Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Chemical Engineering,Food Science
Reference87 articles.
1. B. Bajželj, K.S. Richards, J.M. Allwood, P. Smith, J.S. Dennis, E. Curmi, C.A. Gilligan, Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 4(10), 924–929 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2353 (Number: 10)
2. M. Ercsey-Ravasz, Z. Toroczkai, Z. Lakner, J. Baranyi, Complexity of the international agro-food trade network and its impact on food safety. PLoS ONE 7(5), e37810 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037810 (Number: 5)
3. P. (Nel) Wognum, H. Bremmers, J.H. Trienekens, J.G.A.J. van der Vorst, J.M. Bloemhof, Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains: current status and challenges. Adv. Eng. Inf. 25(1), 65–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.001
4. B. Bajželj, K. Richards, The positive feedback loop between the impacts of climate change and agricultural expansion and relocation. Land 3(3), 898–916 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/land3030898
5. P. Gennari, Y. Seid, S. Sorrenti, D.K Navarro, L. De Simone, V. Bizier, Y. Li, A. Charef, M. D’Orazio, R.,Kamana, C.A. Khalil, S. Ditlecadet, S.: FAO-Statistics: Data on Global Agricultural Domains (2019). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/