Abstract
AbstractWe report findings from an eDelphi study that aimed to explore 16 expert panelists’ perspectives regarding the key attributes of learning experience design (LXD) as it relates to the following: design, disciplines, methods, and theory. Findings suggest consensus was reached regarding LXD’s focus on learner-centrism and incorporating human-centered design practices to design learning environments. LXD practitioners adapt methods and theories from fields such as human–computer interaction and user experience. Implications suggest a need to develop specific methods and theories within our own field.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Abbott, D. (2020). Intentional learning design for educational games: A workflow supporting novices and experts. In M. Schmidt, A. A. Tawfik, I. Jahnke, & Y. Earnshaw (Eds.), Learner and user experience research (pp. 11–32). EdTechBooks.
2. Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n37.2012
3. Ahn, J. (2019). Drawing inspiration for learning experience design (LX) from diverse perspectives. The Emerging Learning Design Journal, 6(1), 1–6.
4. Angeli, C. (2008). Distributed cognition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782508
5. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504859